Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC)
High-priority program
Program level Payment Integrity results
Sponsoring agency: Department of Agriculture
RMA administers the Federal Crop Insurance Program which provides crop insurance to farmers and ranchers. Approved Insurance Providers (AIPs) sell and service the policies through a partnership with RMA and share in the risk associated with losses. RMA's review of improper payments provides results data in which the cause of improper payments (i.e., administrative, certification, process errors, etc.) can be identified along with a means of reducing barriers that may prevent payments from being proper.
View on Federal Program InventoryPROGRAM METRICS
$22,925 M
in FY 2025 outlays, with a
96.7%
payment accuracy rate
-
Improper payment estimates over time
View as:
Chart toggle amounts:Proper paymentsOverpaymentUnderpaymentTechnically improperUnknown
Payment Integrity results
-
FY 2025 improper payment estimates
Chart legend and breakdown
Payment accuracy rate
Improper payment rate
Unknown payment rate
Sampling & estimation methodology details
Sampling timeframe:
07/2022 - 06/2023
Confidence interval:
90% to <95%
Margin of error:
+/-2.5
Causes
RMA’s improper payments reported to OMB under the category of Inability to Access Data/Information consist, mostly, of errors related to the certification process. Approved Insurance Providers (AIPs), through their agents, collect certifications from their policyholders as required by Federal Crop Insurance policies and procedures. Certification errors include but are not limited to; policyholders certifying inaccurate information or certifications that cannot be supported with required documentation.
| Overpayment root cause | Overpayment amount |
|---|---|
| Amount of overpayments within the agency's control | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control | $358.53 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $168.51 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $190.02 M |
| Underpayment root cause | Underpayment amount |
|---|---|
| Amount of underpayments | $396.5 M |
| The amount of underpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist | $0.0 M |
| The amount of underpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $14.16 M |
| The amount of underpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $382.34 M |
| The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation | $0.0 M |
| The amount that could either be proper or improper but the agency is unable to determine whether it was proper or improper as a result of insufficient or lack of documentation | $0.0 M |
Prevention
In April of 2025, RMA completed the program assessment of AIP’s compliance with Spot Check List requirements. The program assessment consisted of six AIPs, drawing on a sample of policies that were not returned to RMA. Of those not returned, the results of this assessment found that the applicable Actual Production History (APH) reviews, Growing Season Inspections (GSIs), and Preharvest Inspections (PHIs) were not performed, or they were performed for the wrong county, year, or policy. These failures can lead to improper payments.
Regarding actions planned: As a result of the RMA’s FY2024 program assessment of the Spot Check List procedures, the agency is implementing a Reconciliation Report, which will be made available to Approved Insurance Providers (AIPs). This report is designed to support AIP compliance with Spot Check List requirements while facilitating timely and accurate reporting of results. Additionally, RMA will incorporate a Spot Check List walkthrough into its AIP Performance Review to verify that AIPs are adhering to the required procedures. Together, these initiatives aim to increase awareness, reinforce procedural compliance, and ultimately contribute to the reduction of improper payments.
Additionally, to address improper payments associated with OMB’s cause categories of Failure to Access Data/Information and Inability to Access Data/Information RMA will conduct a results analysis on a sample of policies that have been reviewed, specifically focusing on instances in which the improper payments occurred as the result of: 1) calculation errors when determining production to count or 2) policyholder’s not being able to support production certifications with acceptable production evidence. The comprehensive analysis will consist of, in part, ascertaining and segregating results data by root cause. Upon completion of this compilation, RMA will implement a targeted mitigation strategy designed to reduce the occurrence of improper payments associated with each root cause category.
RMA conducts a comprehensive analysis of improper payment results on an annual basis. This analysis relates root cause criteria to the associated amount of improper dollars. The analysis first segregates improper payments by OMB root cause categories. Once segregated by root cause category the improper payments are further divided into one of four phases in the crop insurance life cycle (i.e., application, acreage report, actual production history (APH), and claims). From there the improper payments are grouped by error type. This in-depth level of analysis affords RMA the ability to plan corrective actions proportional to the severity of the associated improper payments all while being cognitive of available resources and burdens. These efforts help ensure corrective actions are directly linked to root causes and are carried out successfully with the intent of reducing future improper payments.
Based on the scope and impact of the root cause, corrective actions may include the initiation of new program reviews, recommending policy or procedure changes, issuing Informational Memorandums, or implementing and carrying out other targeted initiatives. This strategic, coordinated approach ensures that corrective actions are both effective and aligned with broader compliance and program integrity goals.
RMA’s comprehensive analysis of improper payment root cause data enables the development of targeted corrective action plans based on cause category, error types, crop insurance lifecycle stages, crop types, states, insurance plans, and other key variables. From there, corrective action plans are designed to influence or change behavior, update current procedures, disseminate informational memorandums, revise policy language, introduce new policy language or procedures, and leverage data analytics. They are also closely integrated with ongoing internal processes such as the AIP Performance Reviews. This approach, combined with continuous root cause analysis and aligned corrective action efforts from other RMA initiatives has proven to be effective as exhibited in RMA’s ability to consistently report one of the lowest improper payment rates across USDA, all while administering a multi-billion-dollar federal crop insurance program.
| Payment type | Mitigation strategies taken | Mitigation strategies planned |
|---|---|---|
| Overpayments | Audit | Change Process |
| Underpayments | Audit | Change Process |
Additional information
Reduction target
3.0 %At this time, the agency has stretched its human capital and information system resources to maintain a tolerable improper payment rate. However, as the program continues to serve more producers with more complex marketing systems additional resources may be necessary.
For the 2027 FY RMA asked for an increase to fund 2 FTEs that were transferred from the FPAC Business Center. RMA specifically is given the authority, pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 1508 (a)(10)(D), to impose sanctions, disqualify, or impose a civil fine for failing to comply with any FCIC requirement, which means only RMA employees have the delegated authority to carry out these functions. Initiating and completing the entire sanction process at the Agency level, rather than passing it back and forth for the Business Center to carry out the administrative portions, will allow for a much more effective, streamlined, less disjointed process.
Risk Management Agency's (RMA's) Administrator, Associate Administrators, and Deputy Administrators of Compliance, Product Management, and Insurance Services are held accountable through annual performance plans to establish internal controls that prevent improper payments from being made, maintain internal controls that prevent improper payments from being made, detect improper payments that are made, and recover improper payments. The Farm Production and Conservation (FPAC) Business Center also provides oversight of RMA's internal controls.