Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Livestock Forage Disaster Program

Program level Payment Integrity results

Sponsoring agency: Department of Agriculture

LFP provides payments to eligible livestock producers who have covered livestock and are producers of grazed forage crop acreage that have suffered a grazing loss due to a qualifying drought or fire during the normal grazing period for the county. The majority of errors causing overpayments are due to administrative errors related to common processes such as following program and payment eligibility determinations and acreage reporting requirements, and not due to producer compliance with program requirements. Most errors could be resolved through additional resources to provide human capital and software enhancement; however, known barriers primarily are a result of lack of funding and resources.

View on Federal Program Inventory

PROGRAM METRICS

$159 M

in FY 2021 outlays, with a

92.0%

payment accuracy rate

PROGRAM METRICS

$554 M

in FY 2022 outlays, with a

90.7%

payment accuracy rate

PROGRAM METRICS

$1,234 M

in FY 2023 outlays, with a

86.3%

payment accuracy rate

PROGRAM METRICS

$1,839 M

in FY 2024 outlays, with a

87.1%

payment accuracy rate

PROGRAM METRICS

$1,201 M

in FY 2025 outlays, with a

93.6%

payment accuracy rate

  • Improper payment estimates over time
    View as:

    Chart toggle amounts:
    Proper payments
    Overpayment
    Underpayment
    Technically improper
    Unknown

Payment Integrity results

  • FY 2021 improper payment estimates

    Chart legend and breakdown

    Payment accuracy rate

    Improper payment rate

    Unknown payment rate


    Sampling & estimation methodology details

    Sampling timeframe:

    10/2019 - 09/2020


    Confidence interval:

    >90%


    Margin of error:

    +/-3.0

Overpayments

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments within the agency's control $0.9 M
Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.9 M

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control $0.0 M

Underpayments

Underpayment root cause Underpayment amount
Amount of underpayments $0.0 M

Technically improper payments

The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation $11.82 M

Additional information

$11.82 M

Unknown Payment Details

Evaluation of corrective actions

•FSA’s New Internal Review Documentation and Tracking System (IRDTS) - FSA has invested in developing IRDTS, a centralized, automated internal control tracking system that allows FSA Management (at all levels) to complete and track internal program audits and reviews. IRDTS allows FSA to incorporate manual-paper based internal control processes in Service Centers into automated processes. The objectives for IRDTS are to improve and enhance oversight capabilities to State and National program managers and formally document review results for program analysis. LFP is scheduled to implement a review in FY22.
•Establishing Annual Compliance Training - Training will be required to create awareness and prepare new and existing employees with the tools to confidently handle situations, protecting Agency’s values, policies, and commitment to applicable compliance laws. Annual training will be established for all FSA employees. The estimated timeframe for establishing this training is by January 30, 2022.
•National LFP training was held in March 18, May 5, June 24, and September 30, 2020 to review policy, common program questions and to discuss root causes of FY 2020 improper payments and policy review associated with those findings. This training was conducted at a more localized level providing smaller sessions to individual states as they triggered for program implementation versus having one national training that may only affect a small portion of the nation at the time of training.
•A monthly LFP policy/software call with state specialists has been established to review program policy and procedures, discuss any questions submitted.  

Future payment integrity outlook

Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Livestock Forage Disaster Program has established a baseline.

Out-Year improper payment and unknown payment projections and target
Current year +1 estimated future outlays $213 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payments $17.02 M
Current year +1 estimated future unknown payments $0 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payment and unknown payment rate 7.99 %

The program's current year improper payment and unknown payment rate of 8.0 % has been achieved with a balance of payment integrity risk and controls and represents the lowest rate that can be achieved without disproportionally increasing another risk, therefore it is the tolerable rate.

The agency has the necessary internal controls human capital, and information systems and other infrastructure support to reduce IPs and UPs. The rate was reduced by more than 30% from the previous year. This is a significant accomplishment and a strong indication that the internal controls are working.

Additional programmatic information

  • FY 2022 improper payment estimates

    Chart legend and breakdown

    Payment accuracy rate

    Improper payment rate

    Unknown payment rate


    Sampling & estimation methodology details

    Sampling timeframe:

    10/2020 - 09/2021


    Confidence interval:

    95% to <100%


    Margin of error:

    +/-3.0

Overpayments

In preventing or reducing improper payments in program, the agency has implemented the following measures: Communications have increased by establishing monthly teleconferences as needed with State Offices with the main purpose of focusing on program deficiencies for improving improper payment percentages and providing policy updates and ad-hoc trainings. These trainings are posted on the Agency’s Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs internal training website and available to all Farm Service Agency employees. An Acreage reporting review is currently underway for fiscal year 2022 to help determine the root cause(s) for administrative errors, including late-filed deficiencies. Farm Service Agency plans to utilize the review results to establish strategies that will improve program processes and establish accountability measures for the remainder of fiscal year 2022 and for fiscal year 2023. Refresher trainings will be developed to specifically address common fiscal year 2022 Payment Integrity Information Act findings across programs, to include agency representative approval procedures, acceptable producer and affiliate filing requirements, as well as County Committee redelegations of authority for approval of documents. A system is being developed for District Directors to report their required reviews on the Livestock Forage Disaster Program SharePoint site which would improve oversight, particularly to improve errors involving the manual entries of carrying capacities and ensuring acreage reporting was on file properly. This process would provide an opportunity to data mine for common issues and allow the National Office to be proactive in identifying anomalies and deficiencies before they become findings on future Payment Integrity Information Act reviews.
Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments within the agency's control $15.85 M
Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $15.85 M

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control $0.0 M

Underpayments

Underpayment root cause Underpayment amount
Amount of underpayments $0.62 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.0 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.62 M

Technically improper payments

The county offices did not follow statutory requirements related to 1) verifying applicants have risk and control in acreage affected by disaster; 2) ensuring that disaster affected acreage was timely reported according to policy; and 3) verifying that applicants meet the adjusted gross income requirements prior to payment.
The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation $35.03 M

Additional information

$35.65 M

Unknown Payment Details

Evaluation of corrective actions

National Livestock Forage Disaster Program training is held every year to review policy, common program questions and to discuss root causes of improper payments and policy review associated with those findings. Beginning in 2020, this training was conducted at a more localized level providing smaller sessions to individual states as they triggered for program implementation. The root cause of administrative errors are primarily isolated to failures to follow compliance and acreage reporting policy. An Acreage reporting review is currently underway for Fiscal Year 2022 to help determine the root cause(s) for failure to access data/information and statutory requirements not met errors, including late-filed deficiencies. Farm Service Agency plans to utilize the review results to establish strategies that will improve program processes and establish accountability measures for the remainder of fiscal year 2022 and for fiscal year 2023. Throughout the fiscal year, National, State, and County program managers will continue to evaluate areas where policy needs revising or to be clarified, and additional training is necessary.

Future payment integrity outlook

Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Livestock Forage Disaster Program has NOT established a baseline.

Out-Year improper payment and unknown payment projections and target
Current year +1 estimated future outlays $848.7 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payments $76.38 M
Current year +1 estimated future unknown payments $0 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payment and unknown payment rate 9.0 %

The program's current year improper payment and unknown payment rate of 9.3 % has been achieved with a balance of payment integrity risk and controls and represents the lowest rate that can be achieved without disproportionally increasing another risk, therefore it is the tolerable rate.

The program reported an improper payment error rate of 9.30% for the fiscal year 2022 payment integrity review cycle which is below the agency's 10% tolerable rate.

Farm Service Agency continues to strategically take the necessary steps to strengthen internal controls measures, establish uniform consistency for compliance processes, and improve accountability. Farm Service Agency’s aim is to not only make these improvements at the program specific level but to initiate transformation at the overall arching and broader Agency level.

Farm Service Agency will require key resources to continue its progression towards strengthening internal controls and addressing the inconsistencies with certain programs reporting more than the statutory improper payment threshold in fiscal year 2022.

Human Capital Needs: National and State Office Compliance Resources - To resolve the Agency’s noncompliance issues in a timely manner, strengthen program integrity and accountability and maintain an ongoing compliance oversight strategy, additional compliance staff will be crucial for Farm Service Agency to build a comprehensive and robust compliance program.

Farm Service Agency once had staff positions whose main responsibility involved monitoring and addressing compliance related issues within states known as Farm Service Agency County Operations Reviewer, but these positions were transferred in fiscal year 2019 from Farm Service Agency to the Farm Production and Conservation Business Center, Performance, Accountability and Risk Division during the Farm Production and Conservation Business Center reorganization. This transfer caused a hardship on Farm Service Agency’s internal controls program and significant resource and specialized knowledge gaps are still prevalent today, which is contributing to Farm Service Agency’s capacity to timely and adequately address various compliance issues and requirements. Farm Service Agency and Performance, Accountability and Risk Division are evaluating the current set up to seek improvements as it relates to Farm Service Agency program compliance. In addition, Farm Service Agency’s existing staff continues to be stretched with the responsibilities of training new staff, administering Farm Service Agency programs, performing existing County Operations Reviewers duties, and addressing new compliance requirements, all as collateral duties. Farm Service Agency and Performance, Accountability and Risk Division are developing a new work plan to better address this issue and goal by first quarter fiscal year 2023 to define an improved workplan to support compliance review.

Information Systems’ Needs – Farm Service Agency is positioning itself to take preventive measures through automated processes that are built into business systems to reduce errors. Automation improves productivity and enforces procedural compliance; therefore, Farm Service Agency is exploring better approaches to integrate internal controls functions into the implementation of programs, as well as maintenance of an existing program systems. Given these efforts, the Agency is planning to request Congressional funding for enhancing: 1) transactional program systems/software to quickly meet the implementation demands of pandemic, emergency, and disaster programs and 2) interface systems to allow data sharing and eliminate manual/duplicative entries and processes.

Several transactional program systems and software “work arounds” and manual processes still exist that are contributing to the increase of program improper payments. Funding is needed to resolve current deficiencies and build internal controls requirements within these systems.

From an internal controls oversight perspective, Farm Service Agency has invested in the Internal Review Documentation and Tracking System and continues to incorporate manual-paper based program reviews and spot-checks into automated processes within the system. The objectives for Internal Review Documentation and Tracking System are to improve oversight capabilities to State and National program managers, supplement data mining efforts and formally document review results for program analysis and enrichment. This effort is ongoing and is planned through fiscal year 2024.

Other Infrastructures Needs - As part of the Agency’s new integrated compliance plan, the design will incorporate further actions to address meeting program reduction targets, including but not limited to: 1) changing the current sampling methodology to using better sound statistical, survey, and data collection methodologies that elevate past issues of “oversampling” and inefficient use of resources, while also ensuring the program dollars are delivered to all producers who are legally entitled to them; 2) utilizing a risk-based approach, where program risks and risk tolerances are identified to allow the right internal controls to be put in place, establish program metrics that gages the success of meeting objectives and need for improvements; 3) integrating a more proactive use of data mining to identify program key performance indicators, anomalies, fraud, waste, and abuse; and 4) performing a validity reassessment of current program oversight processes, such as oversight checklists, redelegation of authorities for approvals, etc.

These actions will also assist in capturing program impacts to targeted arenas of the historically underserved groups and determining where increased efforts are needed to improve accessibility to Farm Service Agency programs and services. For example, implementing routine sampling of denied applications on historically underserved groups to verify if approval and disapproval decisions are being made accurately.

Farm Service Agency is also coordinating with Farm Production and Conservation Business Center and the Department on the multi-year data management efforts to improve transparency, data mining, intelligence dashboards, and program analysis. Equally, significant investments in the development and utilization of program dashboards and visualizations have been made by Farm Service Agency. These efforts are helping to increase transparency, augment analytics capacity and make data readily available to support important mission-focused decision-making.

Farm Service Agency has built a number of dashboards to provide visualizations for its major Farm Programs and Farm Loan Programs, such as Coronavirus Food Assistance Program 1, Coronavirus Food Assistance Program 2, Wildfires and Hurricanes Indemnity Program Plus, Dairy Margin Coverage, Agriculture Risk Coverage and Price Loss Coverage, Conservation Reserve Program, Farm Loan Program Direct Loan Portfolio, Farm Loan Program Loan Obligations, program payments, acreage reporting, etc. Nationwide administrative dashboards to view office workload, productivity, and the geographic servicing areas for Farm Service Agency leadership and managerial staff have also been developed throughout fiscal year 2022.

The Agency is planning to request Congressional funding for enhancing: 1) transactional program systems/software to quickly meet the implementation demands of pandemic, emergency, and disaster programs and 2) interface systems to allow data sharing and eliminate manual/duplicative entries and processes.

Additional programmatic information

  • FY 2023 improper payment estimates

    Chart legend and breakdown

    Payment accuracy rate

    Improper payment rate

    Unknown payment rate


    Sampling & estimation methodology details

    Sampling timeframe:

    10/2021 - 09/2022


    Confidence interval:

    95% to <100%


    Margin of error:

    +/-3.0

  • Actions taken & planned to mitigate improper payments

    Mitigation strategy Description of the corrective action Completion date Status
    Training
    National Payment Eligibility and Payment Limitation training was provided at the National Training session held in Dallas, TX in January 2023. Farm Service Agency conducted a meeting with the purpose of identifying Livestock Forage Disaster Payment software enhancements that can assure the proper completion of the CCC-855 or that written lease requirements are met. The agency conducts monthly training for State Livestock Program Specialists that focuses on issues identified in improper payment testing. Comprehensive training included payment eligibility and acreage reporting requirements.
    FY2023 Q4
    Completed
    Audit
    District Directors reviewed the first five program applications received in the Service Center. The Farm Service Agency has implemented a SharePoint system in fiscal year 2023 for those reviews to be documented and to report any identified program weaknesses to the National Office.
    FY2023 Q4
    Completed
    Training
    The root cause of improper payments was statutory requirements of program not met. The County Office Official did not follow program requirements of having a written lease or completed CCC-855 for the associated acreage, late filed acreage reporting policy according to 2-CP and required eligibility documents on file prior to payment. To address acreage reporting issues, Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs has created a task force who will meet to develop recommendations to inform a timeline of adoption. The task force will develop proposed solutions and training materials. The objectives of this task force are to address improper payment findings related to the acreage reporting process. The training materials developed will be used in future training sessions with county office employees. The Farm Service Agency will conduct monthly training for State Livestock Program Specialists that will focus on issues identified in improper payment testing. Comprehensive program training on program, payment eligibility, and acreage reporting requirements is also planned.
    FY2024
    Planned
    Audit
    District Directors will continue to review the first five Livestock Forage Disaster Program applications received in the Service Center. The agency's National Office Program Manager will monitor the newly created SharePoint system to proactively identify any program weaknesses throughout the current program year application period. In addition, County Office staff did not adhere to first level controls to prevent improper payments to ensure the correct carrying capacity is used for the specific forage and pasture type. The agency will continue to request the prioritization of program software enhancements that will eliminate the manual entry of carrying capacities by interfacing the application system with the National Crop Table.
    FY2024
    Planned

Overpayments

The Farm Service Agency administers all of its programs within the agency. Livestock Forage Disaster Program overpayments within the agency’s control are the result of Failure to access data/information. The overpayments are due to County Office staff did not adhere to first level controls to prevent improper payments to ensure the correct carrying capacity is used for the specific forage and pasture type. To prevent the improper payments for occurring, District Directors are required to review the first five program applications received in the Service Center. Farm Service Agency has implemented a SharePoint system in fiscal year 2023 for those reviews to be documented and to report any identified program weaknesses to the National Office. The agency's National Office Program Manager will monitor the SharePoint system to proactively identify any program weakness throughout the current program year application period.
Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments within the agency's control $27.78 M
Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $27.78 M

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control $0.0 M

Overpayment type Eligibility element/information needed Eligibility amount
Overpayments Within Agency Control Affiliation $27.78 M

Overpayment type Mitigation strategies taken Mitigation strategies planned
Overpayments within the agency’s control Audit Audit

Underpayments

Underpayment root cause Underpayment amount
Amount of underpayments $0.15 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.0 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.15 M

Eligibility element/information needed Eligibility amount
Affiliation $0.15 M

Mitigation strategies taken Mitigation strategies planned
Audit Audit

Technically improper payments

Statutory requirements of the Livestock Forage Disaster Program were not met because the County Office Official did not follow the well documented program requirements of having a written lease or completed CCC-855 for the associated acreage; late filed acreage reporting policy according to 2-CP and required eligibility documents on file prior to payment.
The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation $140.62 M

Mitigation strategies taken Mitigation strategies planned
Training Training

Additional information

$140.77 M

Unknown Payment Details

Evaluation of corrective actions

National Payment Eligibility and Payment Limitation training was provided at the National Training session held in Dallas TX.

In addition, Farm Service Agency completed an analysis of improper payment findings for the program. To address acreage reporting issues, Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs has created a task force who met in August 2023 to develop recommendations to inform a timeline of adoption. One of the
primary objectives of this task force is to address improper payment findings related to the acreage reporting process. The team reviewed policies and software enhancements to identify possible changes that would mitigate risks associated with improper payments. The task force will develop proposed solutions and training materials. The team will provide these recommendations to Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs by December 31, 2023.

Future payment integrity outlook

Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Livestock Forage Disaster Program has established a baseline.

With the implementation of the current corrective actions and the planned corrective actions for the program, it is the agency’s anticipation that the projected reduction target will be less than the estimated future improper payment rate.

Out-Year improper payment and unknown payment projections and target
Current year +1 estimated future outlays $1,900 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payments $189.81 M
Current year +1 estimated future unknown payments $0 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payment and unknown payment rate 9.99 %
Current year +1 estimated future improper payment and unknown payment reduction target 9.99 %

The program's current year improper payment and unknown payment rate of 13.66 % may or may not be the tolerable rate. The agency has not yet determined the tolerable rate for this program.

The agency does not have sufficient resources to add needed internal controls, human resources, and information systems to reduce the improper payment and unknown payments. The agency will continue to strategically take the necessary steps to strengthen internal control measures, establish uniform consistency for compliance processes, and improve accountability. A continuous evaluation system which monitors the effectiveness of internal controls is in place but is not sufficient to reduce improper payments rates. Lastly, agency will require key resources to continue its progression towards strengthening internal controls and addressing the inconsistencies with certain programs reporting more than the statutory improper payment threshold.

Livestock Forage Disaster Program does not have sufficient resources to add needed internal controls, human resources, and information systems to reduce the improper payment and unknown payments. Livestock Forage Disaster Program leverages the existing internal controls environment and accountability processes to provide reasonable assurances that internal controls are in place and operating effectively. A continuous evaluation system which monitors the effectiveness of internal controls is in place but is not sufficient to reduce improper payments rates.

The fiscal year 2024 President’s Budget and the fiscal year 2025 Department Estimates submitted to Office of Management and Budget does not include funding levels to support the required software enhancements to increase application controls. Due to budget constraints for the agency approved funding levels, the funding required to build automated internal controls within the existing systems is not included.

Additional programmatic information

The Safety Net Division within Farm Service Agency has historically communicated to field employees the improper payment percentages and findings which influence the program’s annual proper payment percentage. National Training and monthly calls are provided for field staff covering program policies and payment errors. Online training materials such as PowerPoint presentations, recorded trainings, worksheets, videos, forms, and specialized third-party crop resources are made available for field staff.

  • FY 2024 improper payment estimates

    Chart legend and breakdown

    Payment accuracy rate

    Improper payment rate

    Unknown payment rate


    Sampling & estimation methodology details

    Sampling timeframe:

    10/2022 - 09/2023


    Confidence interval:

    95% to <100%


    Margin of error:

    +/-3.0

  • Actions taken & planned to mitigate improper payments

    Mitigation strategy Description of the corrective action Completion date Status
    Training
    The root cause of these improper payments was failure to access data information. Monthly livestock disaster trainings have been conducted with State office Livestock Forage Disaster Program specialists that provided targeted policy review and the opportunity to review commonly asked questions. All trainings are recorded and posted on Deputy Administrator for Farm Program’s Livestock Forage Disaster Program Training SharePoint site. National Livestock Forage Disaster Program training for state and county offices was held in July 2024 that provided a comprehensive program review with an emphasis on Fiscal Year 2024 Program Integrity Information Act results, which included a review of the requirement to obtain supporting documentation and written leases or form CCC-855 Lease Certification. The training was also recorded and is available on Deputy Administrator for Farm Program’s Livestock Forage Disaster Program Training SharePoint site.
    FY2024 Q4
    Completed
    Automation
    The root cause of these improper payments was failure to access data information. In order to fully mitigate these errors, program software will need to be modified, specifically to incorporate reading an applicant’s farm records to properly identify owners, operators, and other tenants and perform other cross checks to ensure the proper supporting documentation such as a lease or CCC-855 has been completed for the associated grazed acreage claimed. Currently, Farm Service Agency’s information technology budget is not adequately funded to enhance existing software. Farm Service Agency will request Commodity Credit Corporation Section 4 and 11 funding during the Fiscal Year 2025 Commodity Credit Corporation budget request and Working Capital Fund request drills to support this effort. Estimated funding requirements for this system enhancement is $2 million.
    FY2026
    Planned
    Training
    The root cause of these improper payments was failure to access data information. Monthly livestock disaster trainings with State office Livestock Forage Disaster Program specialists will continue that will focus on policy review, updates, and commonly asked questions. Monthly calls are recorded and available for state and county office review at the Deputy Administrator for Farm Program’s Livestock Forage Disaster Program training SharePoint site.
    FY2025
    Planned
    Audit
    The root cause of these improper payments was failure to access data information. Livestock Forage Disaster Program is currently part of Farm Service Agency’s Internal Control roadmap to improve program processes. 1. Currently in development is an improper payment trend analysis tool that has Fiscal Year 2019-2023 improper payment data. The tool will identify staff, county offices and states with continued improper payment findings. The tool will allow the agency to target county offices and staff for targeted training along with holding employees accountable, if warranted after training has been provided. 2. Standardized Training policy for Farm Programs is part of the internal control roadmap for Fiscal Year 2025. Training guidance would provide standardization for Headquarters, State and County level training.
    FY2025
    Planned

Overpayments

The root cause of these improper payments was failure to access data information, and the overpayments were within the agency control (program administered by the Farm Service Agency). These errors primarily involve administrative oversights such as failure to obtain supporting documentation and written leases or form CCC-855 Lease Certification to support the application, and failure to ensure the lease documentation complies with the established policies. Through software enhancements and training on proper processes for obtaining required supporting documentation and written leases/CCC-855 Lease Certifications, these corrective actions should reduce Livestock Forage Disaster Program’s overall improper payment dollars and percentage. However, in order to effectively reduce the improper payments, system enhancements are required. Farm Service Agency’s information technology budget is not adequately funded to modify software to incorporate farm record data to properly identify owners, operators, and other tenants and other cross checks to alert County office staff of the need for special processing. Farm Service Agency will request Commodity Credit Corporation Section 4 and 11 funding during the Fiscal Year 2025 Commodity Credit Corporation budget request and Working Capital Fund request drills. Estimated funding requirements for system enhancement is $2 million.
Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments within the agency's control $102.19 M
Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $102.19 M

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control $0.0 M

Overpayment type Eligibility element/information needed Eligibility amount
Overpayments Within Agency Control Affiliation $102.19 M

Overpayment type Mitigation strategies taken Mitigation strategies planned
Overpayments within the agency’s control Training Audit, Automation, Training

Underpayments

Underpayment root cause Underpayment amount
Amount of underpayments $0.0 M

Technically improper payments

The root cause for this category was related to not following statutory requirements primarily with acreage reporting, supporting documentation, and delegations of authority rules. Acreage reporting requirements were not followed properly, predominantly with late-filed acreage reports incorrectly loaded into the software. Applications were also acted upon by a representative without proper redelegation of authority in place or without the required supporting documentation submitted prior to approval. Statute requires Livestock Forage Disaster Program payments are made based on these areas being compliant.
The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation $134.9 M

Mitigation strategies taken Mitigation strategies planned
Training Audit, Automation, Training

Additional information

$134.9 M

Unknown Payment Details

Evaluation of corrective actions

Incorrect acreage reporting has been a reoccurring finding for Livestock Forage Disaster Program. Accurate accounting can be complex when producers have multiple fields, and especially in multiple counties, or when determined animal units are converted to acres. While training has kept these findings from increasing, automation enhancements are needed to fully assure that administrative errors are mitigated, however funding has not been available. Specific national training has been conducted as recently as July 15-19, 2024. All trainings are recorded and posted on Deputy Administrator for Farm Program’s Livestock Forage Program Training site. Further, Safety Net Division holds monthly Livestock Forage Disaster Program trainings with State Office Livestock Forage Disaster Program specialists to discuss findings and address any questions. All calls are recorded and posted on Deputy Administrator for Farm Program’s Livestock Forage Disaster Program Training SharePoint site. These corrective actions are sufficient to mitigate the program’s $134.90 million of improper payment dollars related to statutory requirements not met.

The root cause of these improper payments was statutory requirements of program not met. Corrective actions such as training and awareness have had a positive impact, which is represented in a reduction in Livestock Forage Disaster Program’s Payment Integrity Information Act error rate in Fiscal Year 2024 compared to Fiscal Year 2023. Overall, Livestock Forage Disaster Program’s improper payment percentage has remained between 9-13 percent for the last three years, which included many pandemic and disaster related ad hoc programs which were being administered during this time with limited resources. These corrective actions are adequate to address the cause of the improper payments.

The root cause of these improper payments was statutory requirements of program not met. The agency has established various task forces that consist of State and county office specialists to discuss issues, findings, and suggest solutions relating to administrative errors in the failure to obtain the required supporting documentation and proper acreage reporting. The outcome was identifying needed software enhancements, developing training opportunities, and issuing policy updates in agency handbooks. These corrective actions are focused on the cause of the improper payments.

Actions taken to reduce Livestock Forage Disaster Program’s improper payment percentage have been effective. In August 2018. Farm Service Agency released a software update that integrated the Crop Acreage Reporting System software in the Livestock Forage Disaster Program application software. With this implementation, acres or animal units are now interfaced directly from producer acreage reports, which are a requirement for Livestock Forage Disaster Program, directly into the Livestock Forage Disaster Program application software. This replaced the manual entries and significantly mitigated errors of calculating the total of eligible acreage. In Fiscal Year 2021, Livestock Forage Disaster Program’s improper payment percentage decreased to 8 percent. Livestock Forage Disaster Program’s improper payment percentage has increased in two of the last three fiscal years in part due to increased participation in Livestock Forage Disaster Program, and a lack of funding for software enhancements.

Actions taken enhancing software to interface eligible acreage or animal units and establishing Livestock Forage Disaster Program monthly trainings with State Livestock Forage Disaster Program specialists, raising improper payment awareness. All actions have contributed to reducing Livestock Forage Disaster Program’s improper payment percentage. These corrective actions will be effectively implemented and prioritized within the agency to reduce improper payments.

Future payment integrity outlook

Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Livestock Forage Disaster Program has established a baseline.

With the implementation of the current corrective actions and the planned corrective actions for the program, it is the agency’s anticipation that the projected reduction target will be less than the estimated future improper payment rate.

Out-Year improper payment and unknown payment projections and target
Current year +1 estimated future outlays $1,706 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payments $182.9 M
Current year +1 estimated future unknown payments $0 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payment and unknown payment reduction target 10.72 %

The program's current year improper payment and unknown payment rate of 12.9 % may or may not be the tolerable rate. The agency has not yet determined the tolerable rate for this program.

The agency’s target rate for Livestock Forage Disaster Program is to have an improper payment percentage below 10 percent, however this may not represent the definition of a “tolerable rate”. All corrective actions taken by the agency have been implemented with the goal to be within the 10 percent threshold.

A tolerable rate for Livestock Forage Disaster Program has not been established; however, the Agency is in the process of establishing additional internal controls for its permanent programs such as Livestock Forage Disaster Program. For example, Farm Service Agency is in the process of establishing a monitoring system to assure that county offices review payments before being issued. The system also has an accountability component to identify offices that struggle to disburse proper payments. Once implemented, Farm Service Agency will be in a position to determine a tolerable rate based on established data. Farm Service Agency will request Commodity Credit Corporation Section 4 and 11 funding during the Fiscal Year 2025 Commodity Credit Corporation budget request and Working Capital Fund request drills. Estimated funding requirements for system enhancement is $2 million.

In order to reduce Livestock Forage Disaster Program’s improper payments, system enhancements and training for staff is required; however, Farm Service Agency’s information technology budget is not adequately funded to implement the requested enhancements. Farm Service Agency will request Commodity Credit Corporation Section 4 and 11 funding during the Fiscal Year 2025 Commodity Credit Corporation budget request and Working Capital Fund request drills. Estimated funding requirements for system enhancement is $2 million.

Additional programmatic information

Accountability for detecting, preventing, and recovering improper payments

Farm Service Agency has incorporated an accountability mechanism into the performance plans applicable to supervisory positions, as specified in Notice PM-3065 “Fiscal Year 2023 Performance Plans” (published December 5, 2022), to ensure adequate internal controls compliance for all programs are in place to improve future program delivery and reduce improper payments. The standards require supervisors to:

• Timely address any Payment Integrity Information Act findings and that training is provided to employees to improve future program delivery and reduce improper payments.
• Ensure automation specialists include program integrity in software.
• Work collaboratively to proactively include processes for program integrity and proper audit trail in software.
• Proactively includes processes for program integrity in procedure, provides timely monitoring of program administration, alerts supervisor immediately as issues of potential concern arise.
• Alert supervisor at once as issues of potential concern arise.

Senior Agency Officials will be accountable for the compliance progress for Livestock Forage Disaster Program, engaging field staff when applicable, and oversight support of the Office of Management and Strategy follow up activities:


· John J. Berge, Acting Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs
· Marcus Graham, Deputy Administrator for Field Operations

  • FY 2025 improper payment estimates

    Chart legend and breakdown

    Payment accuracy rate

    Improper payment rate

    Unknown payment rate


    Sampling & estimation methodology details

    Sampling timeframe:

    10/2023 - 09/2024


    Confidence interval:

    95% to <100%


    Margin of error:

    +/-3.285

Causes

The causes of improper payments were primarily related to not following statutory requirements primarily on late filed acreage reports. Other errors included failure to obtain AD-1026’s for affiliated producers and delegation of authority approvals.
Additionally, improper payments were caused by failure to access data errors related to lease supporting documentation and missing acreage reports.
Specific scenarios that caused the improper payments are:
Missing or incomplete applications
Missing or incomplete acreage reports
Missing or incomplete forms reflecting conservation compliance
Missing or incomplete lease documentation

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments within the agency's control $58.68 M
Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control $0.0 M
Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.0 M
Amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
Amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $58.68 M

Underpayment root cause Underpayment amount
Amount of underpayments $0.0 M

The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation $18.36 M

The amount that could either be proper or improper but the agency is unable to determine whether it was proper or improper as a result of insufficient or lack of documentation $0.0 M

Prevention

FSA’s corrective actions efforts for the LFP program focused on addressing these (5) improper payment issues:
1) Missing program eligibility documentation inadequate or not on file.
2) Acreage reporting is not on file or not properly late filed.
3) Incorrect values entered or applied within the County Acreage Reporting System (CARS) or values not supported by documentation on file.
4) LFP Application/Contract/Agreement not timely filed or approved at the correct levels.
5) Conservation Compliance – FSA form AD-1026 (Highly Erodible Land Conservation and Wetland Conservation) not on file.

To correct these deficiencies and strengthen overall program integrity, FSA implemented a comprehensive set of corrective actions across (4) major areas – Policy, Software Enhancements, Training and Internal Control Processes. The paragraphs below describe the actions taken or planned within each of these categories to mitigate and reduce improper payments and improve program compliance.

Policy
• In response to recurring documentation deficiencies, FSA issued Handbook 2-CP Amendment 28, issued April 12, 2024, which strengthened acreage reporting requirements and improved consistency across county offices. This amendment established clear and consistent procedures for late-filed FSA-578 reports, including acceptable non-physical evidence of crop existence/ disposition of crops when inspections are not performed.
• Completed January 2025, FSA Notice LFP-4: 2024 and Subsequent Year Application Deadline for LFP announced the aligning of all livestock disaster programs’ application deadlines to March 1, which provided consistency for administration of programs and an extended application period specifically for LFP. This extended timeframe will provide county offices with additional time to review applications to ensure late filed acreage reports are filed accurately and the required supporting documentation, particularly AD-1026s for affiliated producers, are on file as required for LFP.
• FSA annually issues an internal directive for field staff that identifies common/program specific error findings (including the findings listed above), the applicable policy references, and instructions for resolving errors identified through the National Payment Integrity Review. The Agency anticipates releasing a notice for the fiscal year 2025 National Payment Integrity Review findings, with a planned completion date of January 2026.
• Additionally, FSA’s Administrator issued an internal compliance memo on April 18, 2025, to all FSA employees, which reinforced the importance of program integrity and set expectations for staff to proactively address internal and external compliance findings and corrective actions. The memo also announced planned compliance activities and reiterated current activities to strengthen FSA programs through risk management and accountability.
• FSA Handbook 1-LFP, Amendment 7, issued August 2025, provided additional clarification on lease agreement requirements and updated program deadlines. These revisions were intended to help reduce errors related to lease agreements and overall program administration.
• FSA Notice LFP-6: CCC-770 LFP District Director (DD) Reviews was issued August 2025 to update FSA’s internal control policies for conducting and completing LFP reviews. These updates are intended to reduce improper payments and overall payment integrity.
Software Enhancements
• Beginning in 2026 and subsequent years, FSA’s Crop Acreage Reporting System (CARS) will automatically determine whether an acreage report for a crop has been timely certified by the applicable reporting deadline and the Agency’s Handbook 2-CP policy. This enhancement was completed March 2025 (be effective for program year 2026) and will help mitigate acreage reporting errors.
• Additionally in February 2025, LFP software was enhanced to interface with USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) National Crop Table to automatically populate crop data outlined on the FSA LFP application to ensure proper payment calculations.

Training
• A series of FSA acreage reporting training courses were developed on USDA’s training platform, AgLearn, for employees. New employees are required to take these courses, while all current employees have access to the training at any time. This action was completed November 2024, and continues strengthen staff knowledge of acreage reporting requirements, increased awareness of policy expectations, and is designed to reduce documentation errors that contribute to improper payments.
• Ongoing monthly livestock disaster program training calls with State Office Specialists will continue to focus on policy review and comprehensive review of all improper payment findings to bring awareness and reduce findings. All training recordings are available for County Offices reference.

Internal Control Process
• Completed March 2025, FSA published the Payment Integrity Information Act Dashboard that includes all high risk tested programs (including LFP) and is based on improper payment findings from fiscal year 2021-2024. This dashboard adds another data source for FSA, providing the ability to identify targeted training needs across States and County Offices and helps to assess if current root causes are new or perennially repeated.
• FSA’s Internal Review and Documentation Tracking System (IRDTS) is utilized to conduct internal spot-checks to detect data anomalies and identify missing program documentation for corrective action. FSA is anticipating internal spot-checks for LFP within IRDTS in fiscal year 2026. Meanwhile, the FSA District Director (DD) Review SharePoint site was developed as part of the internal control review plan with the goal of proactively identifying errors and any program administration issues. This system continues to be a mechanism used to track LFP application reviews, identify findings, and serves as a location to document corrective actions taken until LFP integrates into the IRDTS.
• Spot checks/data mining activities to detect anomalies are being completed to ensure training is provided at critical times and prior to deadlines.
• The FSA CCC-770 LFP Checklist continues to be a compliance tool for program compliance and is used in the county offices administering the program. The objective of the checklist is to reduce the number of missing documentation occurrences prior to payments being made.
• FSA has required all identified high risk programs to have a Program Internal Control Plan (ICP) that outlines program risks, their risk levels and a Risk Matrix that identifies internal control actions taken to mitigate risks. LFP’s ICP was amended, and a Risk Matrix was developed in September 2025, to assist in improving program integrity.
As evidenced by the 6.5% decrease in the LFP improper payment rate since fiscal year 2024, FSA’s corrective actions have been effective in addressing the root causes of improper payments.

FSA’s corrective actions taken and planned to reduce improper payments are proportional to their severity. Improper payment errors are related to:
1) Missing program eligibility documentation inadequate or not on file. (estimated $38.5M)
2) Acreage reporting is not on file or not properly late filed. (estimated $22.7M)
3) Incorrect values entered or applied within the County Acreage Reporting System (CARS) or values not supported by documentation on file. (estimated $6.8M)
4) LFP Application/Contract/Agreement not timely filed or approved at the correct levels. (estimated $4.5M)
5) Conservation Compliance – FSA form AD-1026 (Highly Erodible Land Conservation and Wetland Conservation) not on file. (estimated $4.5M)

FSA, in coordination with the Performance, Accountability and Risk Division of the Farm Production and Conservation (FPAC) Business Center, conducts a comprehensive analysis of improper payment results on an annual basis. This analysis relates specific findings to the associated amount of improper dollars and the frequency of the occurrence of improper payment findings. This in-depth level of analysis affords FSA the ability to plan corrective actions proportional to the severity of the associated improper payments all while being cognitive of available resources and burdens. These efforts help ensure corrective actions are directly linked to specific findings and are carried out with the intent of reducing future improper payments. FSA’s corrective actions related to policy, software enhancements, training and internal control process improvements address the causes of improper payments and are proportional to the severity of improper payments.

Based on the scope and impact of the root causes, corrective actions may include spot checking/data mining for programmatic anomalies, recommending policy or procedure changes, and issuing or implementing other targeted initiatives. This strategic, coordinated approach ensures that corrective actions are both effective and aligned with broader compliance and program integrity goals.
FSA’s comprehensive analysis of improper payment finding types enables the development of targeted corrective action plans based on cause category, error types, locations, and other key variables. From there, corrective action plans are designed to influence or change behavior, update current procedures, disseminate informational memorandums, revise policy language, introduce new policy language or procedures, and leverage data analytics. They are also closely integrated with ongoing internal processes such as internal control plans and risk matrices. This approach, combined with continuous finding analysis and aligned corrective action efforts from other FSA initiatives has proven to be effective as exhibited in LFP’s 6.5% decrease in the improper payment rate as compared to 2024.

Payment type Mitigation strategies taken Mitigation strategies planned
Overpayments Change Process Change Process
Technically improper payments Change Process Change Process

Additional information

LFP provides critical support to livestock producers facing grazing losses from drought or fire with payments calculated based on standardized formulas and eligibility criteria to ensure consistent fair assistance.
FSA is making measurable progress in improving program integrity and accountability and remains committed to building on these improvements as we continue serving America's farmers and ranchers.

Reduction target

6.3 %

The Agency does not have what is needed with respect to internal controls, human capital and information system and other infrastructure to reduce improper payments and unknown payments to a level below which further expenditures to reduce improper payments would cost more than the amount those expenditures would save in prevented or recovered improper payments. Due to reductions in FSA’s budget, staffing losses and recent retirements, FSA has found it challenging to sustain a consistent internal control effort and maintain the capacity required to further decrease improper payment risks. These resource constraints limit the Agency’s ability to fully implement and sustain systems and oversight mechanisms necessary to bring improper payments to their lowest achievable level.

FSA requested $2 million for several program system enhancements to include critical enhancements needed for the Crop Acreage Reporting System (CARS) that strengthens payment-integrity controls. However, the Agency received $344,000, which was allocated across all farm programs to maximize the impact of the limited funding and support the most essential internal control improvements achievable within the reduced budget.

In fiscal year 2022, to address program integrity and accountability deficiencies, FSA incorporated internal control accountability requirements into annual performance plans beginning with FSA Notice PM – 3051. These added criteria require supervisors to establish, document and maintain adequate internal controls to support compliant program delivery and reduce improper payments.
In FSA Notice PM – 3068, issued in fiscal year 2023, FSA expanded these accountability standards to both supervisory and non-supervisory headquarter positions, modifying the “Mission Results” element to include explicit expectations for internal control compliance, monitoring and corrective action implementation. These performance expectations have been carried forward and are now included in performance plans every fiscal year for all supervisory and non-supervisory positions.
Annual performance plan criteria require personnel, especially supervisors, to ensure improper payments are prevented through control activities and overpayments are promptly detected, documented, reported and recovered in accordance with program policy. Supervisors are evaluated on their ability to make sure staff follow required review procedures, maintain accuracy in program certifications and take timely corrective actions when errors or deficiencies are identified.
Internal control accountability applies to:
• supervisors at all levels, who must establish and maintain an effective control environment, conduct oversight and ensure corrective actions are implemented;
• non-supervisory program and operational staff, who must follow established internal control procedures, maintain accurate documentation and support integrity reviews; and
• headquarter program managers, who must implement internal control guidance and ensure National policies support proper payment and error reduction.

Per FSA Notice PM 3088 supervisors are specifically responsible for:
• ensuring internal controls are implemented and functioning as intended;
• monitoring compliance with program policy;
• supporting internal and external audit activities; and
• ensuring timely corrective action and resolving deficiencies identified through reviews.

Steps taken to hold personnel accountable are:
• internal control expectations are embedded in annual performance plans for supervisors and staff forming part of their formal performance evaluation;
• quarterly progress performance reviews assess whether personnel are meeting internal control requirements supporting timely course correction; and
• supervisors must document actions taken to strengthen controls, address program errors and ensure payment accuracy.

Actions taken to monitor progress include:
• FSA conducts monitoring through quarterly performance discussions, internal control reviews and spot checks and quality control findings;
• supervisors are required to provide oversight of program internal controls implementation, verify staff compliance and report progress of completing corrective actions; and
• national spot checks and reviews, including external payment integrity reviews by FPAC-PAR, serve as validation checkpoints to measure whether the control environment is preventing improper payments and correcting deficiencies.

$18.36 M