Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Livestock Forage Disaster Program
Program level Payment Integrity results
Sponsoring agency: Department of Agriculture
LFP provides payments to eligible livestock producers who have covered livestock and are producers of grazed forage crop acreage that have suffered a grazing loss due to a qualifying drought or fire during the normal grazing period for the county. The majority of errors causing overpayments are due to administrative errors related to common processes such as following program and payment eligibility determinations and acreage reporting requirements, and not due to producer compliance with program requirements. Most errors could be resolved through additional resources to provide human capital and software enhancement; however, known barriers primarily are a result of lack of funding and resources.
View on Federal Program InventoryPROGRAM METRICS
$1,201 M
in FY 2025 outlays, with a
93.6%
payment accuracy rate
-
Improper payment estimates over time
View as:
Chart toggle amounts:Proper paymentsOverpaymentUnderpaymentTechnically improperUnknown
Payment Integrity results
-
FY 2025 improper payment estimates
Chart legend and breakdown
Payment accuracy rate
Improper payment rate
Unknown payment rate
Sampling & estimation methodology details
Sampling timeframe:
10/2023 - 09/2024
Confidence interval:
95% to <100%
Margin of error:
+/-3.285
Causes
Additionally, improper payments were caused by failure to access data errors related to lease supporting documentation and missing acreage reports.
Specific scenarios that caused the improper payments are:
Missing or incomplete applications
Missing or incomplete acreage reports
Missing or incomplete forms reflecting conservation compliance
Missing or incomplete lease documentation
| Overpayment root cause | Overpayment amount |
|---|---|
| Amount of overpayments within the agency's control | $58.68 M |
| Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $58.68 M |
| Underpayment root cause | Underpayment amount |
|---|---|
| Amount of underpayments | $0.0 M |
| The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation | $18.36 M |
| The amount that could either be proper or improper but the agency is unable to determine whether it was proper or improper as a result of insufficient or lack of documentation | $0.0 M |
Prevention
1) Missing program eligibility documentation inadequate or not on file.
2) Acreage reporting is not on file or not properly late filed.
3) Incorrect values entered or applied within the County Acreage Reporting System (CARS) or values not supported by documentation on file.
4) LFP Application/Contract/Agreement not timely filed or approved at the correct levels.
5) Conservation Compliance – FSA form AD-1026 (Highly Erodible Land Conservation and Wetland Conservation) not on file.
To correct these deficiencies and strengthen overall program integrity, FSA implemented a comprehensive set of corrective actions across (4) major areas – Policy, Software Enhancements, Training and Internal Control Processes. The paragraphs below describe the actions taken or planned within each of these categories to mitigate and reduce improper payments and improve program compliance.
Policy
• In response to recurring documentation deficiencies, FSA issued Handbook 2-CP Amendment 28, issued April 12, 2024, which strengthened acreage reporting requirements and improved consistency across county offices. This amendment established clear and consistent procedures for late-filed FSA-578 reports, including acceptable non-physical evidence of crop existence/ disposition of crops when inspections are not performed.
• Completed January 2025, FSA Notice LFP-4: 2024 and Subsequent Year Application Deadline for LFP announced the aligning of all livestock disaster programs’ application deadlines to March 1, which provided consistency for administration of programs and an extended application period specifically for LFP. This extended timeframe will provide county offices with additional time to review applications to ensure late filed acreage reports are filed accurately and the required supporting documentation, particularly AD-1026s for affiliated producers, are on file as required for LFP.
• FSA annually issues an internal directive for field staff that identifies common/program specific error findings (including the findings listed above), the applicable policy references, and instructions for resolving errors identified through the National Payment Integrity Review. The Agency anticipates releasing a notice for the fiscal year 2025 National Payment Integrity Review findings, with a planned completion date of January 2026.
• Additionally, FSA’s Administrator issued an internal compliance memo on April 18, 2025, to all FSA employees, which reinforced the importance of program integrity and set expectations for staff to proactively address internal and external compliance findings and corrective actions. The memo also announced planned compliance activities and reiterated current activities to strengthen FSA programs through risk management and accountability.
• FSA Handbook 1-LFP, Amendment 7, issued August 2025, provided additional clarification on lease agreement requirements and updated program deadlines. These revisions were intended to help reduce errors related to lease agreements and overall program administration.
• FSA Notice LFP-6: CCC-770 LFP District Director (DD) Reviews was issued August 2025 to update FSA’s internal control policies for conducting and completing LFP reviews. These updates are intended to reduce improper payments and overall payment integrity.
Software Enhancements
• Beginning in 2026 and subsequent years, FSA’s Crop Acreage Reporting System (CARS) will automatically determine whether an acreage report for a crop has been timely certified by the applicable reporting deadline and the Agency’s Handbook 2-CP policy. This enhancement was completed March 2025 (be effective for program year 2026) and will help mitigate acreage reporting errors.
• Additionally in February 2025, LFP software was enhanced to interface with USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) National Crop Table to automatically populate crop data outlined on the FSA LFP application to ensure proper payment calculations.
Training
• A series of FSA acreage reporting training courses were developed on USDA’s training platform, AgLearn, for employees. New employees are required to take these courses, while all current employees have access to the training at any time. This action was completed November 2024, and continues strengthen staff knowledge of acreage reporting requirements, increased awareness of policy expectations, and is designed to reduce documentation errors that contribute to improper payments.
• Ongoing monthly livestock disaster program training calls with State Office Specialists will continue to focus on policy review and comprehensive review of all improper payment findings to bring awareness and reduce findings. All training recordings are available for County Offices reference.
Internal Control Process
• Completed March 2025, FSA published the Payment Integrity Information Act Dashboard that includes all high risk tested programs (including LFP) and is based on improper payment findings from fiscal year 2021-2024. This dashboard adds another data source for FSA, providing the ability to identify targeted training needs across States and County Offices and helps to assess if current root causes are new or perennially repeated.
• FSA’s Internal Review and Documentation Tracking System (IRDTS) is utilized to conduct internal spot-checks to detect data anomalies and identify missing program documentation for corrective action. FSA is anticipating internal spot-checks for LFP within IRDTS in fiscal year 2026. Meanwhile, the FSA District Director (DD) Review SharePoint site was developed as part of the internal control review plan with the goal of proactively identifying errors and any program administration issues. This system continues to be a mechanism used to track LFP application reviews, identify findings, and serves as a location to document corrective actions taken until LFP integrates into the IRDTS.
• Spot checks/data mining activities to detect anomalies are being completed to ensure training is provided at critical times and prior to deadlines.
• The FSA CCC-770 LFP Checklist continues to be a compliance tool for program compliance and is used in the county offices administering the program. The objective of the checklist is to reduce the number of missing documentation occurrences prior to payments being made.
• FSA has required all identified high risk programs to have a Program Internal Control Plan (ICP) that outlines program risks, their risk levels and a Risk Matrix that identifies internal control actions taken to mitigate risks. LFP’s ICP was amended, and a Risk Matrix was developed in September 2025, to assist in improving program integrity.
As evidenced by the 6.5% decrease in the LFP improper payment rate since fiscal year 2024, FSA’s corrective actions have been effective in addressing the root causes of improper payments.
FSA’s corrective actions taken and planned to reduce improper payments are proportional to their severity. Improper payment errors are related to:
1) Missing program eligibility documentation inadequate or not on file. (estimated $38.5M)
2) Acreage reporting is not on file or not properly late filed. (estimated $22.7M)
3) Incorrect values entered or applied within the County Acreage Reporting System (CARS) or values not supported by documentation on file. (estimated $6.8M)
4) LFP Application/Contract/Agreement not timely filed or approved at the correct levels. (estimated $4.5M)
5) Conservation Compliance – FSA form AD-1026 (Highly Erodible Land Conservation and Wetland Conservation) not on file. (estimated $4.5M)
FSA, in coordination with the Performance, Accountability and Risk Division of the Farm Production and Conservation (FPAC) Business Center, conducts a comprehensive analysis of improper payment results on an annual basis. This analysis relates specific findings to the associated amount of improper dollars and the frequency of the occurrence of improper payment findings. This in-depth level of analysis affords FSA the ability to plan corrective actions proportional to the severity of the associated improper payments all while being cognitive of available resources and burdens. These efforts help ensure corrective actions are directly linked to specific findings and are carried out with the intent of reducing future improper payments. FSA’s corrective actions related to policy, software enhancements, training and internal control process improvements address the causes of improper payments and are proportional to the severity of improper payments.
FSA’s comprehensive analysis of improper payment finding types enables the development of targeted corrective action plans based on cause category, error types, locations, and other key variables. From there, corrective action plans are designed to influence or change behavior, update current procedures, disseminate informational memorandums, revise policy language, introduce new policy language or procedures, and leverage data analytics. They are also closely integrated with ongoing internal processes such as internal control plans and risk matrices. This approach, combined with continuous finding analysis and aligned corrective action efforts from other FSA initiatives has proven to be effective as exhibited in LFP’s 6.5% decrease in the improper payment rate as compared to 2024.
| Payment type | Mitigation strategies taken | Mitigation strategies planned |
|---|---|---|
| Overpayments | Change Process | Change Process |
| Technically improper payments | Change Process | Change Process |
Additional information
LFP provides critical support to livestock producers facing grazing losses from drought or fire with payments calculated based on standardized formulas and eligibility criteria to ensure consistent fair assistance.
FSA is making measurable progress in improving program integrity and accountability and remains committed to building on these improvements as we continue serving America's farmers and ranchers.
Reduction target
6.3 %The Agency does not have what is needed with respect to internal controls, human capital and information system and other infrastructure to reduce improper payments and unknown payments to a level below which further expenditures to reduce improper payments would cost more than the amount those expenditures would save in prevented or recovered improper payments. Due to reductions in FSA’s budget, staffing losses and recent retirements, FSA has found it challenging to sustain a consistent internal control effort and maintain the capacity required to further decrease improper payment risks. These resource constraints limit the Agency’s ability to fully implement and sustain systems and oversight mechanisms necessary to bring improper payments to their lowest achievable level.
FSA requested $2 million for several program system enhancements to include critical enhancements needed for the Crop Acreage Reporting System (CARS) that strengthens payment-integrity controls. However, the Agency received $344,000, which was allocated across all farm programs to maximize the impact of the limited funding and support the most essential internal control improvements achievable within the reduced budget.
In fiscal year 2022, to address program integrity and accountability deficiencies, FSA incorporated internal control accountability requirements into annual performance plans beginning with FSA Notice PM – 3051. These added criteria require supervisors to establish, document and maintain adequate internal controls to support compliant program delivery and reduce improper payments.
In FSA Notice PM – 3068, issued in fiscal year 2023, FSA expanded these accountability standards to both supervisory and non-supervisory headquarter positions, modifying the “Mission Results” element to include explicit expectations for internal control compliance, monitoring and corrective action implementation. These performance expectations have been carried forward and are now included in performance plans every fiscal year for all supervisory and non-supervisory positions.
Annual performance plan criteria require personnel, especially supervisors, to ensure improper payments are prevented through control activities and overpayments are promptly detected, documented, reported and recovered in accordance with program policy. Supervisors are evaluated on their ability to make sure staff follow required review procedures, maintain accuracy in program certifications and take timely corrective actions when errors or deficiencies are identified.
Internal control accountability applies to:
• supervisors at all levels, who must establish and maintain an effective control environment, conduct oversight and ensure corrective actions are implemented;
• non-supervisory program and operational staff, who must follow established internal control procedures, maintain accurate documentation and support integrity reviews; and
• headquarter program managers, who must implement internal control guidance and ensure National policies support proper payment and error reduction.
Per FSA Notice PM 3088 supervisors are specifically responsible for:
• ensuring internal controls are implemented and functioning as intended;
• monitoring compliance with program policy;
• supporting internal and external audit activities; and
• ensuring timely corrective action and resolving deficiencies identified through reviews.
Steps taken to hold personnel accountable are:
• internal control expectations are embedded in annual performance plans for supervisors and staff forming part of their formal performance evaluation;
• quarterly progress performance reviews assess whether personnel are meeting internal control requirements supporting timely course correction; and
• supervisors must document actions taken to strengthen controls, address program errors and ensure payment accuracy.
Actions taken to monitor progress include:
• FSA conducts monitoring through quarterly performance discussions, internal control reviews and spot checks and quality control findings;
• supervisors are required to provide oversight of program internal controls implementation, verify staff compliance and report progress of completing corrective actions; and
• national spot checks and reviews, including external payment integrity reviews by FPAC-PAR, serve as validation checkpoints to measure whether the control environment is preventing improper payments and correcting deficiencies.