7(a) Loan Guarantees Approvals
Program level Payment Integrity results
Sponsoring agency: Small Business Administration
View on Federal Program InventoryPROGRAM METRICS
$26,615 M
in FY 2025 outlays, with a
93.9%
payment accuracy rate
-
Improper payment estimates over time
View as:
Chart toggle amounts:Proper paymentsOverpaymentUnderpaymentTechnically improperUnknown
Payment Integrity results
-
FY 2025 improper payment estimates
Chart legend and breakdown
Payment accuracy rate
Improper payment rate
Unknown payment rate
Sampling & estimation methodology details
Sampling timeframe:
04/2024 - 03/2025
Confidence interval:
95% to <100%
Margin of error:
+/-3.0
Causes
Additional causes were related to data quality and documentation integrity issues, including incomplete or inaccurate information entered into SBA systems, inconsistencies between loan files and system records, and reliance on stale or missing documents at the time of approval. In several cases, lenders obtained SBA loan numbers prior to completing required underwriting steps or verifying eligibility in accordance with program requirements. While some deficiencies were mitigated through post-approval corrective actions such as submission of additional documentation, loan restructuring, or voluntary guaranty reductions, other improper payments could not be fully recaptured because the loans had already closed.
No unknown payments were identified during the review period. All payments classified as improper were attributable to documented failures to meet statutory or policy requirements, rather than an inability to determine payment accuracy. The Agency continues to address these issues through lender outreach, training, referrals to the Office of Credit Risk Management, and ongoing quality control reviews to reinforce compliance and reduce the likelihood of future improper payments.
| Overpayment root cause | Overpayment amount |
|---|---|
| Amount of overpayments within the agency's control | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control | $0.0 M |
| Underpayment root cause | Underpayment amount |
|---|---|
| Amount of underpayments | $0.0 M |
| The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation | $1,632.51 M |
| The amount that could either be proper or improper but the agency is unable to determine whether it was proper or improper as a result of insufficient or lack of documentation | $0.0 M |
Prevention
Training remains a central corrective action. The Agency has continued to deliver lender and internal staff training through established forums, including recurring stakeholder calls, policy-focused briefings, and training-on-demand resources covering eligibility requirements, underwriting standards, documentation expectations, and system data accuracy. These efforts are designed to address the most common root causes identified during reviews, including incomplete credit memoranda, insufficient substantiation, and inaccuracies in system data entries. Lenders are encouraged to participate in Agency-provided training, and review feedback is routinely used to inform updates to training content.
Process improvements and audit-related actions further support payment integrity. Quality control reviews continue to assess lender adherence to statutory and policy requirements, document findings in permanent loan records, and elevate concerns when warranted. Where patterns of deficiencies are identified, referrals are made to the Office of Credit Risk Management for additional review, supervision, or targeted outreach. These actions reinforce accountability while supporting continuous improvement in lender practices and internal oversight.
Collectively, these actions are intended to reduce the likelihood of future improper payments by strengthening front-end compliance, improving documentation quality at the time of approval, and ensuring that identified risks are addressed through coordinated oversight, training, and quality control activities. No unknown payments were identified during the review period, and corrective actions remain focused on preventing improper payments attributable to documentation, eligibility, and process deficiency.
It is important to note that all deficiencies resulting in an improper payment are considered Technical Improper Payments. There are no Unknown, Over, or Under Payments within the loan approvals programs. The agency’s corrective actions are designed to address the causes of Improper Payments and Unknown Payments in proportion to the severity and frequency of the associated root causes. The Office of Financial Program Operations (OFPO) shares targeted loan-level deficiencies with the Office of Credit Risk Management (OCRM) and the Office of Financial Assistance (OFA) when issues reflect significant severity or recurring lender-specific trends. These referrals allow OCRM to consider the deficiencies in its risk-based review process and enable OFA to determine whether policy updates or clarifications are warranted. The SOP for 7(a) approvals was updated and became effective this year with all related job aids and resources updated and published to reflect current requirements. OFPO also provides targeted lender training and internal staff training to reinforce expectations and reduce common error types. Quality Control Specialists monitor each deficiency from identification through completion of corrective actions and obtain additional documentation from lenders when necessary. Collectively, these efforts ensure corrective measures are commensurate with risk and support continued reductions in Improper Payments and Unknown Payments.
| Payment type | Mitigation strategies taken | Mitigation strategies planned |
|---|---|---|
| Technically improper payments | Audit, Change Process, Training | Audit, Change Process, Training |
| Eligibility element/information needed | Description of the eligbility element/information |
|---|---|
| Financial | The financial position or status of a beneficiary, recipient, or their family |
Additional information
Reduction target
5.79 %The agency has implemented and maintained internal controls, staffing structures, and information systems sufficient to support ongoing Payment Integrity activities for the 7(a) Loan Guaranty Approval Program. Existing quality control reviews, lender oversight, training, and referral processes are designed to address the primary root causes of improper payments, including eligibility determinations, documentation sufficiency, and data accuracy. Based on the current risk profile of the program, additional investments beyond those already in place would not be cost-effective relative to the level of improper payments identified. The agency will continue to monitor program risk and adjust controls as necessary to ensure that payment integrity efforts remain proportional and effective.
In the most recent budget submission, the agency requested to maintain current resources to support workforce capacity and operational activities required to ensure payment integrity of the 7(a) Loan Approval process during testing, recoupment, and closeout. These resources are intended to support staff responsible for post loan approval reviews, improper payment identification, recovery efforts, and closeout activities. Despite overall resource constraints in fiscal year 2025, the program prioritized available staffing and funding to sustain payment integrity functions and ensure compliance through the recoupment and closeout phase.
As a means to reduce and/or eliminate the occurrence of improper payments, a Corrective Action Plan has been developed for the program. In addition, managers are held accountable for meeting the program's improper payment rate and unknown payment rate reductions targets. These targets are incorporated into managers' annual performance appraisal goals. Senior management provides oversight to ensure program milestones are met. Senior management is responsible for maintaining sufficient internal controls to prevent improper payments and developing the Quality Control/Improvement Program to determine whether the loan is proper or improper payment. In addition, senior management has established and maintained sufficient and appropriate control environment.