Universal Service Fund - High Cost Legacy
Program level Payment Integrity results
Sponsoring agency: Federal Communications Commission
View on Federal Program InventoryPROGRAM METRICS
$1,911 M
in FY 2025 outlays, with a
96.7%
payment accuracy rate
-
Improper payment estimates over time
View as:
Chart toggle amounts:Proper paymentsOverpaymentUnderpaymentTechnically improperUnknown
Payment Integrity results
-
FY 2025 improper payment estimates
Chart legend and breakdown
Payment accuracy rate
Improper payment rate
Unknown payment rate
Sampling & estimation methodology details
Sampling timeframe:
01/2023 - 12/2023
Confidence interval:
95% to <100%
Margin of error:
+/-1.89
Causes
Incorrect depreciation method could be caused by the following: 1) used the ending balance instead of the average monthly balance, 2) used an incorrect rate or 3) there was an error in the calculation. Inadequate documentation - assets could be caused by the following: 1) missing invoices or inventory documents OR documentation didn't support the spread of overhead.
| Overpayment root cause | Overpayment amount |
|---|---|
| Amount of overpayments within the agency's control | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control | $32.66 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $32.66 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $0.0 M |
| Underpayment root cause | Underpayment amount |
|---|---|
| Amount of underpayments | $29.59 M |
| The amount of underpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist | $0.0 M |
| The amount of underpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $29.59 M |
| The amount of underpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $0.0 M |
| The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation | $0.0 M |
| The amount that could either be proper or improper but the agency is unable to determine whether it was proper or improper as a result of insufficient or lack of documentation | $0.0 M |
Prevention
High Cost continue to take the following corrective actions. Through USAC's Risk Management Council meetings, the different USF program teams discussed strategic initiatives and risk that may impact USAC’s goals. The Risk Management Council meetings will continue to provide an opportunity to analyze and respond to identified changes and related risks to maintain an effective internal control system. The meetings are completed on an ongoing quarterly basis.
High Cost will conduct its annual Circle of Life webinars to address top common audit findings. The webinar will provide common errors and best practices suggested to avoid these findings. The webinars are completed on an ongoing annual basis.
Monthly meetings will continue to be held between USAC’s Audit and Assurance
Division (AAD) and USAC leadership to discuss findings identified by AAD. During
these meetings, corrective actions are discussed to prevent similar findings in the
future. The meetings occur on a monthly basis.
The High Cost Program will continue to focus on PIA activities to mitigate improper payments. The results of the program integrity will have a major impact on the root cause related to the improper payment rate. The PIA activities include collaborating with USAC's Audit and Assurance Division partners to provide the annual Circle of Life webinars, meeting with NECA monthly, and continue existing analysis and data validation for legacy funds. The annual Circle of Life webinar references FCC rules and provides common error examples and recommends best practices to avoid these findings. The monthly NECA meeting is used by High Cost to evaluate processes based on audit finding feedback. With the annual data validation, High Cost compares projected and actual cost study data that determines carriers' support.
During the meetings, management has an opportunity to discuss effective improper payment mitigation strategies. This process has enabled USAC management to institutionalize corrective actions as part of its program integrity efforts, which will prevent future instances of improper payments. USAC leadership is implementing a quarterly review process to discuss progress
towards executing these corrective actions.
| Payment type | Mitigation strategies taken | Mitigation strategies planned |
|---|---|---|
| Overpayments | Audit, Cross Enterprise Sharing, Training | Audit, Cross Enterprise Sharing, Training |
| Underpayments | Audit, Cross Enterprise Sharing, Training | Audit, Cross Enterprise Sharing, Training |
| Eligibility element/information needed | Description of the eligbility element/information |
|---|---|
| Financial | The financial position or status of a beneficiary, recipient, or their family |
Additional information
Reduction target
3.0 %The High Cost program has the internal controls, human capital, information systems, and other infrastructure it requires to reduce improper payments to the target levels. The FCC and USAC will continue to expand internal controls as necessary and will develop the human capital to ensure it meets its goals.
The High Cost program team did not identify additional resources needed to improve the overall structure of the program in its most current budget submission. The FCC and USAC continues to work to determine the gaps in its overall requirements.
The FCC works through its program administrator, USAC to complete payment
recapture audits known as Beneficiary and Contributor Audit Program (BCAP). BCAP audits are designed to identify overpayments that must be recaptured, assess compliance with FCC rules, and deter waste, fraud, and abuse. USAC’s improper payment testing program is known as Payment Quality Assurance (PQA). Through PQA, USAC utilizes a statistical sampling methodology to estimate the annual amount of improper payments in the USF-HC, USF-LL, USF-RHC, and USF-S&L programs. The goal of the PQA assessment plan is to estimate an improper payment error rate based on non-compliance with FCC rules. To recover improper payments, USAC has implemented an enterprise recovery policy to standardize the reporting and recovery of improper payments. All USAC improper payments are deemed collectible and USAC has either recovered or is in the process of recovering the improper payments.