Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies

Program level Payment Integrity results

Sponsoring agency: Department of Education

View on Federal Program Inventory

PROGRAM METRICS

$14,917 M

in FY 2021 outlays, with a

85.2%

payment accuracy rate

PROGRAM METRICS

$15,202 M

in FY 2022 outlays, with a

64.3%

payment accuracy rate

PROGRAM METRICS

$15,932 M

in FY 2023 outlays, with a

100.0%

payment accuracy rate

  • Improper payment estimates over time
    View as:

    Chart toggle amounts:
    Proper payments
    Overpayment
    Underpayment
    Technically improper
    Unknown

Payment Integrity results

  • FY 2021 improper payment estimates

    Chart legend and breakdown

    Payment accuracy rate

    Improper payment rate

    Unknown payment rate


    Sampling & estimation methodology details

    Sampling timeframe:

    10/2019 - 09/2020


    Confidence interval:

    >85%


    Margin of error:

    +/-2032.98

Overpayments

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments within the agency's control $0.0 M

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control $0.93 M
Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.93 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M

Underpayments

Underpayment root cause Underpayment amount
Amount of underpayments $0.0 M

Technically improper payments

The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation $2,202.94 M

Additional information

$2,202.94 M

Unknown Payment Details

Evaluation of corrective actions

The Department relies on its robust internal control framework and continues to address gaps, strengthen internal control processes, and align assessments with enterprise risk management. All of these efforts reflect the Department’s commitment to demonstrating payment integrity and responsible financial stewardship to the American taxpayer.

Future payment integrity outlook

Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies has NOT established a baseline.

The program's current year improper payment and unknown payment rate of 14.77 % has not been achieved with a balance of payment integrity risk and controls and does not represent the lowest rate that can be achieved without disproportionally increasing another risk, therefore it is not the tolerable rate.

The Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program has the internal controls, human capital, information systems and other infrastructure
the program needs to reduce improper payments.

Additional programmatic information

  • FY 2022 improper payment estimates

    Chart legend and breakdown

    Payment accuracy rate

    Improper payment rate

    Unknown payment rate


    Sampling & estimation methodology details

    Sampling timeframe:

    09/2020 - 10/2021


    Confidence interval:

    90% to <95%


    Margin of error:

    +/-10.02

Overpayments

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments within the agency's control $0 M

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control $24.23 M
Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $24.23 M

Underpayments

Underpayment root cause Underpayment amount
Amount of underpayments $0 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.01 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M

Technically improper payments

The Department identified some payments that were technically improper due to lack of Local Educational Agencies applications that demonstrates funding eligibility.
The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation $699.31 M

Additional information

$699.32 M

Unknown Payment Details

The Department's unknown payments were attributed to not receiving documentation prior to the conclusion of the study and/or not receiving sufficient documentation to support the payment as being proper or improper.

The amount of payments that could either be proper or improper but the agency is unable to determine whether they were proper or improper as a result of insufficient or lack of documentation is $4,707.02 M


Cause of insufficient or lack of documentation & why the documentation is needed for determination of payment type
Payment cause Amount Description of the documentation that was not provided and explanation of why the program is unable to conclude whether the payment is proper or improper without that documentation

Evaluation of corrective actions

The Title I, Part A Grants to Local Educational Agencies program concluded its second year of reporting in FY 2022. However, the program's sampling and estimation methodology plan was revised in FY 2022. While the baseline for the program has not been established and the tolerable rate has not been identified, the program has taken steps to address the unknown payments identified at the conclusion of the study. For each unknown payment sample in the study, the responsible program office will provide a written determination whether the payment was proper or improper. The program offices will communicate to their subprogram grantees regarding obtaining and/or providing supporting documentation to the Department, as part of its efforts to comply with PIIA. Messaging to grantees will include establishing expectations by providing grantees with background on PIIA, the anticipated timeline, the importance of being attentive and responsive to the payment integrity team’s communications and requests, and the type of documentation requested under the Fiscal Year 2023 methodology to substantiate sampled payments.

Future payment integrity outlook

Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies has NOT established a baseline.

Out-Year improper payment and unknown payment projections and target
Current year +1 estimated future outlays $15,932.33 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payment and unknown payment rate 0 %

The program's current year improper payment and unknown payment rate of 35.72 % may or may not be the tolerable rate. The agency has not yet determined the tolerable rate for this program.

The Title I, Part A Grants to Local Educational Agencies program has concluded its second year of estimation. However, in Fiscal Year 2022, the program's sampling and estimation methodology plan was modified; therefore, the program has not yet established a baseline.

A baseline for a program is not considered established until the conclusion of a 24-month reporting period. The Title I, Part A Grants to Local Educational Agencies program concluded its second year of reporting in FY 2022. However, the program's sampling and estimation methodology plan was revised in FY 2022. While the tolerable rate for the Title I, Part A Grants to Local Educational Agencies program has not been identified, the program has the internal controls, human capital, information systems and other infrastructure to reduce improper payments and unknown payments.

A baseline for a program is not considered established until the conclusion of a 24-month reporting period. The Title I, Part A Grants to Local Educational Agencies program concluded its second year of reporting in FY 2022. However, the program's sampling and estimation methodology plan was revised in FY 2022.

Additional programmatic information

  • FY 2023 improper payment estimates

    Chart legend and breakdown

    Payment accuracy rate

    Improper payment rate

    Unknown payment rate


    Sampling & estimation methodology details

    Sampling timeframe:

    10/2021 - 09/2022


    Confidence interval:

    90% to <95%


    Margin of error:

    +/-5.0

  • Actions taken & planned to mitigate improper payments

    Mitigation strategy Description of the corrective action Completion date Status
    Training
    The Department has worked internally to address accounting errors that resulted in rounding errors made by the recipients of the funds. The small amounts identified relative to the program outlays would not usually present an opportunity to efficiently use resources to attempt to recover.
    The corrective action was not fully completed this reporting period
    Not Completed

Overpayments

Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments within the agency's control $0 M

The overpayments encountered are outside of agency control due to the fact that the direct recipients of funds (State Education Agencies or SEAs) acted as pass-through entities to their sub-grantees, who were the ultimate recipients. As such, the Department processed the relevant payments to the SEAs based on their internal controls and payment review process. Furthermore, these overpayments were due to rounding errors in most instances. Additionally, in certain cases where the Department did make the direct payment to the end user, the documentation submitted was seemingly sufficient except for minor rounding errors. The small amounts involved would not usually justify expending additional resources or time to have Department staff reperform the calculations.
Overpayment root cause Overpayment amount
Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control $0 M
Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.01 M

Overpayment type Eligibility element/information needed Eligibility amount
Overpayments Outside Agency Control Financial $0.01 M

Underpayments

Underpayment root cause Underpayment amount
Amount of underpayments $0 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist $0.0 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M
The amount of underpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment $0.0 M

Eligibility element/information needed Eligibility amount
Financial $0.0 M

Mitigation strategies taken Mitigation strategies planned
Training

Technically improper payments

The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation $0.0 M

Additional information

$6 M

Unknown Payment Details

Evaluation of corrective actions

Response not applicable because the Title I, Part A program’s IP and UP estimate is below the statutory threshold.

Future payment integrity outlook

Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies has established a baseline.

The program's reported improper and unknown payment estimate is below the statutory threshold; therefore, the program is not required to establish and publish a reduction target for the next Fiscal Year.

Out-Year improper payment and unknown payment projections and target
Current year +1 estimated future outlays $17,088.5 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payments $0 M
Current year +1 estimated future unknown payments $0 M
Current year +1 estimated future improper payment and unknown payment rate 0 %
Current year +1 estimated future improper payment and unknown payment reduction target 0 %

The program's current year improper payment and unknown payment rate of 0.0 % may or may not be the tolerable rate. The agency has not yet determined the tolerable rate for this program.

The program's reported improper and unknown payment estimate is below the statutory threshold; therefore, the program is not required to establish and publish a reduction target for the next Fiscal Year. With no reduction target established, the tolerable rate cannot be determined.

The program's reported improper and unknown payment estimate is below the statutory threshold; therefore, the program is not required to establish and publish a reduction target and tolerable rate for program has not been identified, However, Title I, Part A has the internal controls, human capital, information systems and other infrastructure to maintain a low improper payment and unknown payment rate for the next Fiscal Year. With no reduction target established, the tolerable rate cannot be determined.

The Title I, Part A program did not need to request additional resources in the most
recent budget submission, in order to establish and maintain its current internal controls.

Additional programmatic information

Unknown Payments (UPs) were the primary driver of this program’s high estimated Improper Payment (IP) and Unknown Payment (UP) rate reported in FY22. The UPs identified in FY22 were the result of lack of documentation due to the delayed start of the study and the payment recipients not understanding what type of supporting documentation to provide to satisfy the requirements of the study.

The Department implemented effective mitigation strategies in FY23 which resulted in the elimination of UPs, and subsequently the significant reduction of the estimated IP and UP rate in FY23. The strategies implemented are as follows:

The Department began the FY23 study earlier in the fiscal year, providing sufficient time for State Education Agencies (SEAs) to obtain and provide supporting documentation from Local Education Agencies (LEAs) for the program’s payments.

The Department also provided SEAs with targeted technical assistance and training. This assistance encompassed technical assistance meetings with certain states, written guidance, and payment documentation criteria guidance.

Additionally, The Department formally issued its policy on Payment Integrity, providing guidance to agency employees, in Fiscal Year 2023.