Federal Pell Grant Program
High-priority program
Program level Payment Integrity results
Sponsoring agency: Department of Education
The Pell Grant program provides need-based grants to low-income undergraduate and certain post baccalaureate students to promote access to postsecondary education. Root causes of Pell overpayments include incorrect calculation of Return of Title IV funds, failure to return unclaimed credit balances to the Department, and failure to meet satisfactory academic progress. Barriers include the program structure of the Pell program, which requires that funds pass through an intermediary Non-Federal entity before reaching the ultimate beneficiary (student). The statute provides FSA authority to require the third-party to impose certain internal controls or mitigation strategies, and FSA exercises this authority.
View on Federal Program InventoryPROGRAM METRICS
$39,934 M
in FY 2025 outlays, with a
98.9%
payment accuracy rate
-
Improper payment estimates over time
View as:
Chart toggle amounts:Proper paymentsOverpaymentUnderpaymentTechnically improperUnknown
Payment Integrity results
-
FY 2025 improper payment estimates
Chart legend and breakdown
Payment accuracy rate
Improper payment rate
Unknown payment rate
Sampling & estimation methodology details
Sampling timeframe:
10/2023 - 09/2024
Confidence interval:
95% to <100%
Margin of error:
+/-1.78
Causes
In addition to using the OMB A-123C framework for identifying the causes of improper and unknown payments, FSA takes a detailed approach to identifying the root causes for its Phase 2 programs. This is accomplished through the Sampling and Estimation Methodology Plan (S&EMP), which leverages data from compliance audits. By analyzing these data sources, FSA is able to pinpoint specific root causes that contribute to improper payments and unknown payments within its programs.
For fiscal year (FY) 2025, FSA’s fieldwork revealed that the most impactful root causes of improper and unknown payments stemmed from several distinct areas. First, payments were linked to ineligible institutions, programs, or locations, indicating that funds were disbursed in violation of Title IV eligibility criteria. Second, documentation deficiencies played a critical role, particularly instances where required notifications, such as informing students of impending disbursements, were not provided prior to the release of Title IV funds. Third, errors related to student withdrawal, such as mistakes in the calculation or processing of Return of Title IV Funds (R2T4), contributed to improper payments. Finally, failure to meet Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) requirements resulted in funds being disbursed to students who did not maintain the academic standards mandated by federal regulations.
FSA's commitment to understanding and mitigating improper payments extends beyond identification of root causes as described above. The agency actively coordinates with its stakeholders to ensure that all potential root causes are considered during its testing procedures. Through extensive fieldwork and stakeholder collaboration, FSA has currently identified more than 45 program-specific root cause categories for improper payments and unknown payments. This comprehensive approach enables FSA to continually refine its processes and reduce the risk of improper payments across its portfolio.
| Overpayment root cause | Overpayment amount |
|---|---|
| Amount of overpayments within the agency's control | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments outside the agency's control | $337.67 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $0.0 M |
| Amount of overpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $337.67 M |
| Underpayment root cause | Underpayment amount |
|---|---|
| Amount of underpayments | $6.13 M |
| The amount of underpayments that occurred because the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment does not exist | $0.0 M |
| The amount of underpayments that occurred because of an inability to access the data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $0.0 M |
| The amount of underpayments that occurred because of a failure to access data/information needed to validate payment accuracy prior to making a payment | $6.13 M |
| The amount of improper payments that were paid to the right recipient for the correct amount but were considered technically improper because of failure to follow statute or regulation | $76.88 M |
| The amount that could either be proper or improper but the agency is unable to determine whether it was proper or improper as a result of insufficient or lack of documentation | $5.91 M |
Prevention
Additional efforts included the implementation of behavioral and process-driven strategies, such as outreach campaigns to raise applicant awareness of accurate FAFSA completion and adjustments to the FAFSA form itself based on the FAFSA Simplification Act. By modifying application questions and emphasizing early outreach about student aid eligibility, FSA worked to reduce errors and omissions that may contribute improper or unknown payments. These measures, completed by Q4 of FY 2025, leveraged both behavioral insights and process improvements to ensure applicants provide correct and complete information.
To further safeguard payment accuracy, FSA relied on predictive analytics, automation, and ongoing training. The FAFSA Processing System used advanced analytics to flag applicants for verification. Additionally, FSA employed R programming and logarithmic analysis to estimate and predict rates of improper and unknown payments. These models are reviewed and updated annually to set reduction targets and maintain compliance with federal guidance. Simultaneously, FSA delivered a suite of free trainings and updated guidance for school financial aid administrators, helping institutions stay current on verification requirements and compliance issues. This information was published in the FSA Handbook and made available to the public.
Audit and oversight functions formed the final layer of FSA’s approach. Throughout FY 2025, FSA performed program reviews of selected schools and monitored annual Single Audit Act compliance audits conducted by independent auditors. Schools with identified deficiencies were required to develop corrective action plans, which FSA then monitored and evaluated for effectiveness. When improper payments were traced and deemed recoverable, FSA established accounts receivable and pursued collections. All oversight and corrective actions were completed by the end of FY 2025 Q4.
Preventing IPs is a top Administration and agency priority. To effectively prevent IPs and UPs from occurring, FSA evaluates the root causes of IPs and UPs identified. This root cause analysis is used to help formulate effective correction actions and prioritize efforts to prevent IPs and UPs from occurring. For example, FSA's most impactful root cause over the last five years for total IP in aggregate across all programs has been improper payments due to misreported income. FSA has invested significant resources and worked cross-agency with the IRS to implement the authorities provided in the FUTURE Act to obtain federal tax information data directly from the IRS. Significant work has been accomplished, and was fully implemented in FY 2025, and this corrective action has shown a significant reduction in misreported income on the FAFSA.
FSA relies on the expertise of its subject matter experts and owners of the corrective actions to identify any changes for its corrective actions. FSA monitors the status of the corrective actions through periodic outreach to corrective action owners and collects closure evidence to evaluate the effectiveness and progress of each individual mitigation strategy. This process informs whether the corrective action can be refined, intensified, expanded, or should be discontinued or replaced.
The adequacy of these corrective actions is reinforced by the agency's comprehensive support and oversight mechanisms. FSA maintains a robust internal control framework, including program risk assessments and reviews, which help to identify and address vulnerabilities in payment processes. The agency also provides ongoing training, guidance, and resources to school financial aid administrators, which specifically target the root causes of improper payments at the institutional level. Activities such as clarifying verification requirements, responding to administrator questions, and utilizing compliance audits under the Single Audit Act ensure that corrective actions are not only well-implemented but also effective in reducing both improper and unknown payments. Timely resolution of audit findings and cross-enterprise sharing of best practices further contribute to sustained improvement in payment integrity, indicating that the agency’s actions are both adequate and successful in reducing payment errors.
| Payment type | Mitigation strategies taken | Mitigation strategies planned |
|---|---|---|
| Overpayments | Audit, Automation, Behavioral/Psych Influence, Change Process, Cross Enterprise Sharing, Predictive Analytics, Statutory Change, Training | Audit, Behavioral/Psych Influence, Change Process, Cross Enterprise Sharing, Predictive Analytics, Training |
| Underpayments | Audit, Automation, Behavioral/Psych Influence, Change Process, Cross Enterprise Sharing, Predictive Analytics, Statutory Change, Training | Audit, Behavioral/Psych Influence, Change Process, Cross Enterprise Sharing, Predictive Analytics, Training |
| Technically improper payments | Audit, Automation, Behavioral/Psych Influence, Change Process, Cross Enterprise Sharing, Predictive Analytics, Statutory Change, Training | Audit, Behavioral/Psych Influence, Change Process, Cross Enterprise Sharing, Predictive Analytics, Training |
| Unknown payments | Audit,Automation,Behavioral/Psych Influence,Change Process,Cross Enterprise Sharing,Predictive Analytics,Statutory Change,Training | Audit,Behavioral/Psych Influence,Change Process,Cross Enterprise Sharing,Predictive Analytics,Training |
| Eligibility element/information needed | Description of the eligbility element/information |
|---|---|
| Education | The education level or enrollment status of the recipient/beneficiary |
Additional information
FSA places the highest value on maintaining the integrity of all types of payments made to ensure that the billions of dollars in federal funds it disburses annually reach intended recipients in the right amount and for the right purpose, including for the Direct Loan program. FSA ensures payment integrity by establishing effective policies, business processes, systems, and controls over key payment activities, including those pertaining to: payment data quality, cash management, third-party oversight, assessments of audit reports, and financial reporting. Accordingly, FSA maintains a robust internal control framework that includes controls designed to help prevent, detect, and recover improper payments. In designing controls, FSA strives to strike the right balance between making timely and accurate payments and ensuring that controls put in place are not too costly or overly burdensome and thereby deter intended beneficiaries from obtaining funds they are entitled to receive.
Reduction target
1.07 %The Pell program achieved its tolerable rate. FSA has the internal controls, human capital, and information systems and other infrastructure needed to continue to maintain IP and UP estimates within the tolerable rate band. FSA must also continue to rely on controls established by external entities that receive funds and make payments on behalf of FSA for programs including Pell Grants. These entities are outside of FSA’s operational control. FSA will continue to leverage data from program reviews and Single Audit Act compliance audits to identify and address root causes of IPs and UPs made by external entities.
The FY 2026 budget provides $2.06 billion for the Student Aid Administration, which is straight lined from the fiscal year 2024 appropriation. This funding is essential to support students and student loan borrowers. The funding would allow FSA to continue to operate the student aid programs, implement critical improvements to student loan servicing, continue to modernize its digital infrastructure, and provide for the administration of the financial aid programs through a simplified and streamlined application process for students and borrowers.
FSA managers and staff are held accountable for maintaining effective controls and payment integrity. FSA performs an annual assessment of the effectiveness of its internal controls, including those controls designed to prevent or detect improper payments. Any deficiencies identified are remediated and retested within the next assessment cycle.
FSA has an integrated system of complementary oversight functions to help prevent, detect, and recover improper payments, and ensure compliance by all participating parties. This includes routinely conducting program reviews to confirm that schools meet requirements for institutional eligibility, financial responsibility, and administrative capability. Program reviews evaluate schools’ compliance with federal requirements, assess monetary liabilities for errors in performance which are calculated based on program review findings, and identify actions schools must take to make whole the Higher Education Act’s Title IV programs or recipients for any funds that were improperly managed and prevent the same problems from recurring. FSA also uses Single Audit Act compliance audits as a key source of identifying risks and potential improper payments made by schools. FSA has worked with fund recipients to resolve audit findings timely.