PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION

The PBGC Inspector General concluded in its report issued on March 24, 2025, that the agency was compliant with the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 (PIIA) in the OIG's most recent evaluation of the agency's Payment Integrity risk assessment conducted in FY 2024. PIIA requires agencies to review and assess all programs and activities with annual outlays greater than $10,000,000 for improper payment risk at least once every three years to identify those susceptible to significant improper payments. In FY 2025, PBGC performed a risk assessment of three payment streams in accordance with our three-year rotation strategy. The three payment streams reviewed during FY 2025 were Multiemployer Special Financial Assistance Payments, Contractor Payments and Multiemployer Financial Assistance Payments. In performing the risk assessments, PBGC considered factors specified in statute and further defined in OMB guidance, including the complexity of the payment stream; the volume of payments; recent major changes in program funding, authorities, practices, or procedures; the level, experience, and quality of training for personnel responsible for making program eligibility determinations or certifying that payments are accurate; whether the program is new to the agency; whether payments or payment eligibility decisions are made outside of PBGC; significant deficiencies in the audit reports issued by the PBGC Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO); similarities to other programs that have reported improper payments (IP) and unknown payments(UP) estimates; the accuracy and reliability of IP and UP estimates previously reported for the program; whether the program lacks information or data systems to confirm eligibility; and the risk of fraud as assessed by the agency under the Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government published by the Government Accountability Office. Based on the results of the Phase 1 risk assessments, PBGC determined that the Multiemployer Special Financial Assistance Payments, Contractor Payments and Multiemployer Financial Assistance Payments were not susceptible to significant risk of improper payments as defined by the law and OMB implementation guidance.

Show full executive summary

Recovery information

View as:

Chart toggle amounts:
Overpayment amount identified for recapture
Overpayment amount recovered

Recovery of overpayments

Please note: Overpayment amounts recovered are reported in the year they were recovered, not the year they were identified. Therefore it is possible in some years to have a recovery rate greater than 100%.

Overpayment amount identified through recovery activities $11.9 M
Overpayment amount recovered through recovery activities $11.9 M
Recovery activities recovery rate 100.0 %

Why recovery audits are not cost effective in certain programs

Benefit Payments disburses over $5 billion in payments annually to over 800,000 participants each month. Due to the dollar value, payment volume, program complexity, and nature of pension payments, PBGC has implemented electronic data analysis, including death match and other procedures, to identify payments that maybe in error. Potential improper payments are subjected to further analysis based on the amount of the payment, the nature of the potential error, and other risk factors to determine whether amounts are due to PBGC.
PBGC has established procedures to recapture overpayments through recovery payments, installment repayment agreements, offsets against other continuing benefits to recoup amounts owed by the participant, or referrals to the Department of Treasury’s Centralized Receivables Service.
In some cases, recapture of payments may not be sought based on demonstration that a participant is experiencing financial hardship or other reasons. Contractor Payments includes the disbursement of over $300 million annually. Due to the dollar value, payment volume, and the nature of contract payments, PBGC has implemented electronic data analysis, including do not pay matching and other procedures, to identify payments that may be in error. In addition, invoice reviews are periodically performed to help assess the accuracy of amounts billed. Potential improper payments are subjected to further analysis based on the amount of the payment, the nature of the potential error, and other risk factors to determine whether amounts are due to PBGC. PBGC has established procedures under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to seek reimbursement from contractors that have been overpaid. Further, under the FAR, previous payments are made are generally subject to adjustment based on over or under payments and any amounts due are normally addressed prior to or at contract closeout.
Payments to Federal Employees includes disbursement of about $150 million annually. PBGC’s payroll and other employee payments are processed by the Department of the Interior’s (DOI) Interior Business Center (IBC). PBGC receives a Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements(SSAE) No. 18 report that reports on the DOI IBC payment operations. No weaknesses related to payroll and other employee payments were reported in the most recent SSAE No. 18. Included in PBGC’s and DOI’s internal controls are that a series of personnel actions are needed to change salaries or process bonus payments. Also, employees receive a payroll statement every two weeks. While mistakes can occur in any operation, PBGC has not experienced significant levels of improper payroll payments. Also, if a mistake is identified, any overpayments can be netted against or offset future payments to those employees or deducted from the last paycheck processed after termination. A review of the following did not identify significant payment issues: >Improper payment risk assessments, >agency Inspector General reviews, >Government Accountability Office reports, and >results of the agency audit resolution and follow up process.
Given the historic low risk nature of payroll disbursements, including the existence of adequate payment processing controls and reviews, and the ability to readily recover any improper payments by offset against future payments through normal payroll operations, establishing a separate payment recapture program for this payment stream is unnecessary and would not be cost effective.
Multiemployer Plan Financial Assistance includes disbursement of over $160 million per year. MEPD generally processes an average of357 financial assistance payments annually to an average of 95 plans. Multiemployer plans are required to provide proof of plan insolvency, sign promissory agreements, and undergo an initial audit to determine if the plan is eligible to receive ongoing assistance from the PBGC. Additionally, multiemployer plans are required to provide documentation to support estimates of future expenses prior to receiving financial assistance on a yearly, semi annually, quarterly, or monthly basis. The PBGC’s Multiemployer Program Division (MEPD) reviews all financial assistance requests in accordance with established policies and procedures to verify requests are reasonable, complete, accurate, and comply with ERISA. MEPD rejects or reduces the amount of financial assistance requested by plans if the administrative and/or benefit expenses do not agree to supporting documentation or if there was a prior overpayment. Additionally, throughout the year, plans submit documentation to support actual expenses incurred to validate a plan’s previous estimate of plan expenses and adjust the most recent financial assistance request amount if the actual amount of expenses significantly varied from the plan’s initial estimate, and MEPD auditors review this documentation and perform a detailed reconciliation. Multiemployer plans are insolvent and generally have no other sources of financial resources beyond PBGC. In addition, there are just over 100 plans, so this is not a large universe of payees to monitor within the existing structure. A review of the following did not identify significant payment issues: >improper payment risk assessment >agency Inspector General reviews, >Government Accountability Office reports, and >results of the agency audit resolution and follow up process. Given the lower payment dollar value and volume, the nature of the multiemployer plan financial assistance program, payment processing controls, and the ability to adjust future financial assistance amounts by actual expenses incurred, establishing a separate payment recapture program for this payment stream would not be considered cost effective.
Premium Refunds issued ranges roughly $88 to $203 million on an annual basis. All premium refund requests are subject to review prior to disbursement with larger payments subjected to additional approvals. Given that each pension plan has an ongoing account with PBGC as to premium amounts due, any adjustments for under or over payments can be reflected in the PBGC’s Statement of Account for each plan. Plans may contest any attempt to recapture overpayments. A review of the following did not identify significant payment issues: > Improper payment risk assessments, > agency Inspector General reviews, > Government Accountability Office reports, and > results of the agency audit resolution and follow up process.
Based on above and especially since there is not significant dollar value or payment volume associated with this payment stream, establishing a separate payment recapture program for this payment stream is not considered cost effective.

Supplemental Information

PBGC participates in the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s DNP program. For example, under the Payments to Contractors stream, pre-payment verification procedures are performed so vendors are screened in the DNP prior to certification in the U.S. Treasury’s Secure Payment System (SPS). In addition, prior to payment, PBGC verifies that contractors are properly registered in the General Services Administration’s System for Award Management (SAM), have not been debarred or suspended from contracting in the federal sector. For FY 2025, PBGC did not identify any improper payments using the DNP process for the Payment to Contractors payment stream.

The Working System has reduced/prevented improper payments:

The Working System strives to maintain accurate data. However, the past year, PBGC has identified incorrect information in the Working System Monthly.

PBGC was found compliant during the most recent PIIA compliance review.

Show full list of compliant programs Expand

Compliant programs:

  • Benefit Payments
  • Contractor Payments
  • Multiemployer Financial Assistance Payments
  • Multiemployer Special Financial Assistance Payments
  • Payments to Federal Employees
  • Pension Plan Termination Insurance
  • Premium Refunds

Program name When was the last improper payment risk assessment conducted? Likely to be susceptible to significant improper payments? Substantial changes made to the assessment methodology used for the reporting cycle
Benefit Payments 2024 No No
Contractor Payments 2025 No No
Multiemployer Financial Assistance Payments 2025 No No
Multiemployer Special Financial Assistance Payments 2025 No No
Payments to Federal Employees 2023 No No
Pension Plan Termination Insurance *
Premium Refunds 2024 No No

* Assessment year is not displayed because one or more of the following statements is true:

  1. Not required to conduct a risk assessment under the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019,
  2. Already assessed for improper payment risk under a different name in a prior reporting period, and/or
  3. New and planning to perform a risk assessment in the future.